Hello,
First, I want to ask that you seriously pray for our country. I fear the standards for Presidential candidates has continual been going down hill. I do not expect these people to be angels or perfect. However, most of you that I am mailing….I consider basically to be honest, ethical and moral upstanding citizens.. but not without blemishes or sins… That said…repeated..aberrations or deviations from a moral or ethical code? What does this say? Or, is the old adage….rules and laws are great as long as they don’t apply to me.
Is Trump perfect….well I won’t say he is….womanizer….well I think he has a history of cheating on his wives…child out of wedlock….Business man….yes…gone into bankruptcy? Well the government keeps writing red ink all the time….Trump did come back from bankruptcy…not paying taxes…these are the legal laws.. if show loss don’t have to pay taxes… he knows how to make others feel inferior….my first choice…notta. Hot temper..maybe…could be an act… Point he mad about Obama’s birth certificate….I am sure he is smart enough to know where Obama was born didn’t matter because his mother was an American…as long as one parent is an American…the offspring is a full American citizen with rights and privileges (think about missionaries, those serving overseas in the military or just employed by multinational corporation). Point during debate I wish journalist or Hilary had made to educate our children/other. Media has definitely had a field day pointing out Trump’s short comings. Like I said he has plenty..and some are continual running themes…Do I believe that all the women that came forward about his unwanted attentions are lying? Are telling the truth? No I don’t think all are lying and I don’t think all of them are telling the truth. Politics make me think some must be politically motivated. Can I doubt all? He has a history of cheating…I can’t just make snap judgements…
But consider that the press seems to be considerably more less aggressive towards painting a picture of Hilary Clinton’s behaviors.
Consider starting with her marriage.
Hilary Rodham was her pick. Nothing wrong with deciding this is the way she wants it. People do change their minds. Personally, (I know…plenty of my family will give me heck for this…) I have changed my mind on the death penalty(being anti death penalty–I understand people have a right to their opinion to be pro if they choose as I have a right to be anti).
Yet, it feels that changes in Ms. Clinton’s life tend to be at times when it is also politically convenient to do so. When her husband was forfeiting ground in the Governors’ race, she decided Hilary Rodham Clinton was better.
Ms. Clinton had a job in the investigation of Nixon during the Watergate extravaganza. It seemed to me I remembered this and stories. I found this link
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/01/hillary-fired-for-lies-unethical-behavior-from-senate-job-former-boss/
This talks about Jerry Ziefman, Chief Counsel to House Judiciary firing Hilary for unethical behavior wanting to deny Nixon representation. Checking snoops get this:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/zeifman.asp
Of course, snopes.com total denies the complete thing…. going here
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/01/hillary-fired-for-lies-unethical-behavior-from-senate-job-former-boss/
This talks about Jerry Ziefman, Chief Counsel to House Judiciary firing Hilary for unethical behavior wanting to deny Nixon representation. Checking snoops get this:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/zeifman.asp
Of course, snopes.com total denies the complete thing…. going here
Get that he didn’t fire her…couldn’t but that his opinion was not very high of her and that she did work on a brief or documents to deny Nixon representation or his lawyers complete access to that which was legally his right. The basis for this is that there is no precedent for procedure in impeachment. Which this is wrong see this link on the first impeachment of a president…President Johnson:
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/john_chap_08.asp
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/john_chap_08.asp
Besides, this is the United States…it is basic to be able to have a lawyer present…even at a basic administration hearing….
Now let us consider the emails. Unless Hilary is less educated, had a head injury or just plain stupid, as Secretary of State, I am sure she knew having a private email server was huge violation of law and a security risk that she should have checked with CIA/FBI/DEpartment of DEFENSE and the JOINT CHIEFs of staff….if NOT HER BOSS COMMANDER IN CHIEF..OBAMA and if she did ask..well we have bigger issues to check into.
She served on the Watergate investigation…Nixon guilty of obstruction of justice? Most likely…..Treason? I doubt it.
Hilary guilty of Treason? What is the definition of Treason?
Treason – https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381 “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres (closely attached) to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Treason&rlz=1C9BKJA_enUS691US691&oq=Treason&aqs=chrome..69i57j0j5j0.3922j0j7&hl=en-US&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
Synonyms ” treachery, disloyalty, betrayal, faithlessness; sedition, subversion, mutiny, rebellion; high treason, lèse-majesté; apostasy; literary perfidy”
Treason – https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381 “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres (closely attached) to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Treason&rlz=1C9BKJA_enUS691US691&oq=Treason&aqs=chrome..69i57j0j5j0.3922j0j7&hl=en-US&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
Synonyms ” treachery, disloyalty, betrayal, faithlessness; sedition, subversion, mutiny, rebellion; high treason, lèse-majesté; apostasy; literary perfidy”
FBI findings/reports links
https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton
Documents in the vault
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-releases-documents-in-hillary-clinton-e-mail-investigation
https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton
Documents in the vault
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-releases-documents-in-hillary-clinton-e-mail-investigation
Here is a quote from the first investigation..
“Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).
“Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).
None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.
Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.”
It is clear that one in top government should be expected to protect clearly classified information even if for some reason it wasn’t correctly marked classified….as I stated…she was Secretary of State….she should….or I suspect she is smart enough to know using a private server is a no no for emails that might contain confidential material or emails from other countries ..individuals that want to keep things out of public know….
I will not go into all issues…can’t but check the Wikileaks Clinton emails
Brought out how addressed Wall Street telling them what they want to hear.
On Hilary think how she would even consider working on a document that limits representation to counsel…would leave emails vital to the United State’s well being or relationships with other countries in question…come on….she didn’t know using a private server was not allowed or a problem?
Is it okay for her to participate in obstruction of justice but in her youth she investigated Nixon for this….thinking there was no precedent for his representation? Yet, she deleted evidence and may have even passed on confidential information? Not knowing the law is an excuse for breaking it? How many people in prison today wish they got that get out of jail card? And, they aren’t even lawyers? Do I think she could be considered for a treason conviction? Did she pass on any information that hurt the United States? Caused military person or such to be hurt? Think? Our economy?
I am not telling you how to vote. This is only asking you to consider this things. PRAY FOR OUR COUNTRY. I am serious. I am taking this serious. My vote will be for the person that will limit freedoms the least.
I think it is sad that our choices are ….
Respectfully and sincerely,
Sandra
PS As always if you have proof positive all of the above is wrong…send it….I will consider it! PROMISE.